Article 199 of the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other ample remedy is provided by regulation." It's well-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust out there remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether Those people remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
The court emphasised that in cases of intentional murder, the gravity on the offense demands the most stringent punishment, considering the sanctity of human life and deterrence for probable offenders.
4. It's been noticed by this Court that there is usually a delay of one day within the registration of FIR which has not been explained by the complainant. Moreover, there is no eye-witness in the alleged prevalence along with the prosecution is relying on the witnesses of extra judicial confession. The evidence of extra judicial confession with the petitioners has been tendered by Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram through their statements recorded under Section 161, Cr.P.C., on 06.02.2018. Both of these namely Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram occurred to be the real brothers of your deceased but they did not react in the least to your confessional statements with the petitioners and calmly observed them leaving, a single after the other, without even moving an inch. They have not mentioned in their statements that the accused held some weapon when they visited them to confess their guilt about the murder of Ghulam Farid which could have precluded these witnesses from apprehending the petitioners. Their conduct does not glimpse much inspiring or natural. The petitioner, namely, Mst. Mubeena Bibi was arrested on 14.02.2018 and there is not any explanation concerning why her arrest was not effected after making with the alleged extra judicial confession. It's been held on lots of situations that extra judicial confession of an accused can be a weak form of evidence which could possibly be manoeuvred through the prosecution in any case where direct connecting evidence does not come their way. The prosecution is usually depending on the evidence of Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal which is equally fragile, as both the witnesses Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal didn't say a word as to existence of some light within the place, where they allegedly observed the petitioners together over a motorcycle at 4.
Rulings by courts of “lateral jurisdiction” are certainly not binding, but can be used as persuasive authority, which is to provide substance to the party’s argument, or to guide the present court.
“Ensuring the accuracy of legal information is paramount,” says Barrister Ayesha Khan, a leading legal expert in Lahore. “Cross-referencing information from multiple respected sources is essential for reliable legal research.”
Please use just one username and password set from the options. If it does not work please check out the other. Just about every allows single person access only - so please remember to log off properly when you have concluded your session in Manupatra.
Retribution: Section 302 PPC also serves the purpose of retribution, where society seeks justice with the loss of a life. It allows the legal system to impose a proportional punishment within the offender, ensuring They're held accountable for their actions.
already been released from the jail completion of his term . Appeal dismissed on merits (Murder Trial)
The prosecution presented substantial evidence, like eyewitness testimonies and expert forensic analysis, confirming the copyright nature on the seized currency.
The law of necessity identified and upheld by Pakistan's highest judicial body has proved an honorable protection for military adventure in civil government.it was the illegal action called legislation of necessity..
Criminal cases During the common law tradition, courts decide the legislation applicable to your case by interpreting statutes and applying precedents which record how and why prior cases have been decided. Compared with most civil legislation systems, common regulation systems Stick to the doctrine of stare decisis, by which most courts are bound by their individual previous decisions in similar cases. According to stare decisis, all reduce courts should make decisions constant with the previous decisions of higher courts.
Article 199 of your Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other sufficient remedy is provided by legislation." It is very well-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust available remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether People remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
A coalition of residents sent a letter of petition towards the Supreme Court to challenge the Water and Power Enhancement Authority’s (WAPDA) construction of an electricity grid station in their community, on designated “green belt” property. The Court heard the matter like a human rights case, as Article 184 (three) on the Pakistan Constitution delivers original jurisdiction for the Supreme Court to choose up and determine any matter concerning the enforcement of fundamental rights of public importance.
To receive notification from the Supreme Court of website Virginia plus the Court of Appeals of Virginia when opinions, orders, rule changes, dockets and other information has become accessible, please enter your contact information down below.